The Netflix series Atypical emerged as one of the more widely discussed portrayals of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in recent years. Its popularity signaled a cultural moment where neurodiversity was gaining visibility, but not necessarily depth, in mainstream media. As a neurodivergent individual, I approached the series with a mixture of anticipation and caution, hoping to see an authentic, respectful representation of autism while remaining mindful of how media often falls short in portraying marginalized experiences.
This reflection offers a critical assessment of Atypical, considering not only its portrayal of autism but also its broader implications for media representation, Western societal norms, and the consumption patterns that shape public understanding.
Before viewing Atypical, I expected a thoughtful depiction of a young man with autism navigating adolescence. I hoped for a narrative that was both affirming and realistic; one that captured the complexities of neurodivergence without resorting to caricature. In some respects, the series delivered. Sam’s sensory experiences, internal monologue, and routines often mirrored my own, and I found moments of genuine connection, particularly when he used coping strategies such as headphones to manage overstimulation.
However, the emotional response was far from simple. I often felt uncertain, disoriented, even conflicted. Certain portrayals rang true, while others seemed filtered through a neurotypical gaze designed more to elicit understanding from outsiders than to reflect lived experience from within the spectrum.
Of all the characters, I most strongly identified with Sam. Many of his struggles; navigating social cues, seeking emotional intimacy, and managing sensory overload parallel my own. His efforts to assert independence while negotiating the concerns of well-meaning but overbearing caregivers struck a particularly familiar chord.
The series also dedicates significant attention to Sam’s family, highlighting the ripple effects of neurodivergence. Elsa, his mother, embodies both fierce protectiveness and the limitations of overcontrol. Doug, his father, evolves from emotional distance to a genuine, if awkward, reconnection with his son. Casey, Sam’s sister, brings additional complexity; struggling with her own identity while often sidelined in service to the family’s focus on Sam. These portrayals underscore how systemic expectations around “normalcy” shape family roles and emotional labor in neurodivergent households.
In its early seasons, Atypical largely centers a narrow representation: a white, heterosexual, academically capable male. While the show later incorporates autistic writers and expands its cast to include more diverse autistic characters, the initial portrayal of Sam leans heavily into common tropes of literal thinking, rigid routines, and awkwardness around intimacy. While these characteristics are valid for some, presenting them as definitive risks reinforcing a singular, limited view of what autism looks like.
For viewers unfamiliar with autism, Sam’s portrayal may serve as a first exposure. For those of us with lived experience, it is both validating and frustrating. Some feel seen. Others feel stereotyped or erased. What remains clear is that no single narrative can encompass the diversity of the spectrum, and that authentic storytelling requires input from those who live the experience, not just observe it.
A recurring theme in Atypical is the tension between individual identity and societal expectation. The series illustrates how Western norms around productivity, independence, and emotional conformity often marginalize those who do not—or cannot—fit the mold.
Sam’s journey is not just about navigating autism; it is about navigating a culture that insists on rapid progression, social competence, and normative behavior. His coping mechanisms, such as using headphones to manage sensory input, are treated as disruptions rather than valid adaptations. In contrast, characters like Casey also confront rigid expectations particularly around gender and sexuality, highlighting the broader social pressures imposed on all who deviate from dominant cultural scripts.
Atypical arrives within a media landscape increasingly responsive to calls for representation. Its presence on a platform like Netflix is significant, but its impact is mixed. On one hand, the show raises awareness and humanizes neurodivergent experiences for a broad audience. It demonstrates the inner world of a young autistic man, explores familial dynamics, and fosters conversations around neurodiversity.
On the other hand, it risks flattening complexity in pursuit of relatability. Early creative decisions, such as casting a neurotypical actor in the lead role and excluding autistic voices; undermine its commitment to authenticity. Moreover, its focus on a high-functioning narrative may reinforce the idea that only certain autistic individuals are worthy of visibility and support.
This duality is not uncommon in media. Stories of disability are often filtered through a lens of inspiration or tragedy, rather than presented as multidimensional lived realities.
In an age of streaming and algorithm-driven recommendations, stories like Atypical are frequently consumed rapidly and superficially. Viewers may engage emotionally but fail to interrogate the underlying assumptions or structural biases embedded in the narrative.
This overconsumption fosters a dangerous illusion: that representation alone equates to progress. In truth, consuming content is not a substitute for critical engagement, systemic change, or meaningful inclusion. Media can inform, but it can also misinform, especially when audiences mistake scripted portrayals for universal truths.
To engage responsibly, we must ask difficult questions: Whose voices are represented? Whose are excluded? And how might these portrayals shape public policy, education, healthcare, and interpersonal attitudes?
Watching Atypical prompted a deep reflection on my own experiences; particularly around societal expectations, access to support, and the emotional labor involved in masking discomfort for the sake of others. It challenged me to consider how neurodivergence is valued conditionally, often linked to perceived productivity or social compatibility.
Despite its flaws, the series inspired me to continue contributing to conversations about inclusion, representation, and disability justice. It reinforced the importance of centering lived experience and reminded me that visibility without voice is never enough.
Atypical represents both a cultural milestone and a cautionary tale. It opened doors for broader discussion of autism and neurodiversity, but it also revealed the limitations of stories shaped without full community participation. True inclusion requires more than a single storyline. It requires a plurality of voices, a willingness to challenge norms, and an intentional shift away from passive consumption toward critical reflection.
As media consumers and advocates, we bear a shared responsibility to demand better more accurate, more inclusive, and more equitable portrayals of disability and difference. Representation is not the final destination; it is the beginning of a much longer journey toward empathy, justice, and understanding.
Thank you for taking the time to engage with this reflection. By thinking critically about the media we consume, we take a step toward a more inclusive, thoughtful, and authentic world on and off-screen.
Ian Allan
Self-Advocate for The Arc of Northern Virginia
Ian Allan is a self-advocate with a deep commitment to policy literacy, systems change, and disability justice. Through The Arc of Northern Virginia, he works to ensure that people with intellectual and developmental disabilities are not merely served by systems, but are actively shaping them.
As a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization, The Arc of Northern Virginia relies on private support from individuals, corporations, organizations, and foundations to fund our efforts. Your generous donations help make it possible for us to provide programs, services, and advocacy so that people with IDD can live “A Life Like Yours.”
Stay Informed with the Latest News and Updates
